The path of global resistance to hegemony, dictatorship, and arbitrariness has become clear, for this reason, the United States and its allies are better off coming to terms with this reality and not separating themselves from humanity.
Author: Talib Aliyev, analyst, especially for "Sangar"
The United States does not have the right to interfere in the affairs of other states and dictate its will to them. Washington has no right to strive to be the leader of the whole world because this world is different, each has its own interests and development goals.
Mutually beneficial cooperation with the United States, which leads to the development of the economy, and the strengthening of sovereignty - YES. But the development of relations with Washington in exchange for the obligation to follow the instructions of American capitalists is NO. But it just so happened that after the Second World War, the Americans, due to various tricks, managed to make the dollar the main world currency and successfully integrate into the club of the winners of fascism. This contributed to the fact that the United States, protected from everyone by the world's oceans and having received an unlimited opportunity to issue the dollar, began to attract the best specialists in all areas, providing them with a standard of living unavailable in their country. In essence, it was a controlled and deliberate theft of brains for their own benefit. And one could not notice this if the development of the United States would also contribute to the development of their partners. But this potential was used in a different way.
Political scientists have calculated that the United States has intervened in the affairs of 50 countries more than 130 times. Since 1945, Washington has used military force more than 25 times in Asia, Europe, Latin America, and the Middle East. Not a single country in the world today can be insured against the fact that, under certain conditions, its territory will be bombed, and marines will land on the coast.
According to the RAND Corporation, an American strategic research center, the United States has been involved in 286 conflicts since World War II. RAND explored this topic to understand when Americans benefited from meddling in other people's affairs and when they didn't. It is clear that in most conflicts the United States was not directly involved, that is, it did not send troops and did not even bomb other countries. They "simply" supported certain forces in foreign states against others, either financially or with weapons, as was the case, for example, in El Salvador in the 70s. Or "simply" provided intelligence information to one of the parties to the conflict. You can remember the Falklands War, when in this way the United States supported Great Britain against Argentina. Or the current hostilities in Ukraine.
After all the conflicts, in no case did the Americans manage to build democracy and raise GDP per capita in other countries, although in most cases this was declared as their main goal. Other goals like access to certain resources, maintaining control of the Panama Canal and countering Moscow and Havana in the big geopolitical games, yes, but these no.
At the same time, almost all operations that were associated with the presence of American troops on foreign territory dragged along a long trail of criminal and war crimes. Everywhere it came to the killing of civilians. There have been many instances in Afghanistan of drone operators confusing wedding corteges with militant columns. The Americans also robbed historical museums in Iraq and then tried to sell priceless artifacts of ancient Babylon over the Internet.
The actions of the United States in recent years have raised a lot of questions. The flight from Afghanistan and the abandonment of a huge number of weapons in this country cannot go unnoticed. At the same time, the Americans actively maintain contact with the Taliban. They discuss anything, but not the fate of the huge arsenals of weapons left in this country.
It goes without saying that after World War II, a number of countries, especially today's European Union, took themselves under the wing of the United States and united with them in organizations such as NATO. In some wars, like Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, and Syria, they have been partners with the US. This also means that they are also US collaborators and are responsible for their actions.
So what are the US and its allies bringing to the world? Progress or disaster? After analyzing the world events of recent years and the present, we tend to answer: more trouble than progress. We do not need such a West. Let's cancel the West together! We need a different world, where all countries will be equal among themselves, where there is a fair system of international security within the framework of the UN, with the participation of the SCO, the CIS, the CSTO, and other organizations with the participation of the countries of Central Asia and the states of the global south.
In a word, the US and its allies must understand that the time of monopolies and their dictate has come to an end. Today or tomorrow the world will put them in their place because such an understanding of what is ripe in the minds of mankind has cleared up the path of global resistance to hegemony, dictatorship, and totalitarianism. It is better for the US and its allies to come to terms with this reality and stand next to other humanity.
